Friday, June 16, 2023

A01357 - Sultan Khan, Indian Chess Master

88888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888

Sultan Khan (commonly referred to with honorifics as Mir Sultan Khan or Mir Malik Sultan Khan, b. March 13, 1903, Mitha Tiwana, Khushab District, British India - d. April 25, 1966, Sargodha, Punjab, Pakistan) was a Punjabi chess player, and later a citizen farmer in Pakistan, who is thought to have been the strongest chess master of his time from Asia. 


The son of a Muslim landlord and preacher, he travelled with Colonel Nawab Sir Umar Hayat Khan (Sir Umar), to Britain, where he took the chess world by storm. In an international chess career of less than five years (1929–33), he won the Brtitish Championship three times in four tries (1929, 1932, 1933), and had tournament and match results that placed him among the top ten players in the world. 


Sir Umar then brought him back to his homeland, where he gave up chess and returned to cultivate his ancestral farmlands in the area which became Pakistan. He would live on these lands for the rest of his life, as a proud citizen of Sargodha. 


Sultan Khan perhaps the greatest natural player of modern times. However, although he was one of the world's top players in the early 1930s, FIDE, the World Chess Federation, never awarded him any title (such as Grandmaster of International Master).


Sultan Khan was born on March 13, 1903 in Mitha Tiwana, Khushab, Sargodha which today is in Pakistan.   He was born into to a Muslim Awan family of pirs and landlords. He learned Indian chess from his father at the age of nine. By the time he was 21, he was considered the strongest player in Punjab.


At that time, Sir Umar took him into his household with the idea of teaching him the European version of the game and introducing him to European master chess.  


In 1928, Sultan Khan won the all-India championship, scoring eight wins, one draw, and no losses.


In the spring of 1929, Sir Umar took Sultan Khan to London, where a training tournament was organized for his benefit. Due to his inexperience with European chess and lack of theoretical knowledge, he did poorly, tying for last place with H. G. Conde, behind William Winter and Frederick Yates.  After the tournament, Winter and Yates trained with Sultan Khan to help prepare him for the British Chess Championship to be held that summer.  To everyone's surprise, Sultan Khan won. Soon afterwards, he went back to India with Sir Umar.


Returning to Europe in May 1930, Sultan Khan began an international chess career that included wins over many of the world's leading players. H is best results were second to Savielly Tartakower at Liege 1930; third at Hastings 1930–31 (+5−2=2) behind future World Champion Max Euwe and former World Champion Jose Raul Capablanca; fourth at Hastings 1931–32; fourth at Bern 1932 (+10−3=2); and a tie for third with Isaac Kashdan at London 1932, behind World Champion Alexander Alekhine and Salo Flohr. Sultan Khan again won the British Championship in 1932 and 1933. 


In matches, Sultan Khan narrowly defeated Tartakower in 1931 (+4−3=5) and narrowly lost to Flohr in 1932 (+1−2=3).


Sultan Khan thrice played first board for England at Chess Olympiads. At Hamburg 1930, there was still no rule that teams must put their best player on the top board, and some teams, unconvinced of his strength, matched their second or even third-best player against him. He scored nine wins, four draws, and four losses (64.7%).  


At Prague 1931, Sultan Khan faced a much stronger field. He had an outstanding result, scoring eight wins, seven draws, and two losses (67.6%).  This included wins against Flohr and Akiba Rubinstein and draws with Alekhine, Kashdan, Ernst Grunfeld, Gideon Stahlberg, and Efim Bogolynbov.  


At Folkestone 1933, Sultan Khanhad his worst result, an even score, winning four games, drawing six, and losing four.  Once again, his opponents included the world's best players, such as Alekhine, Flohr, Kashdan, Tartakower, Grünfeld, StÃ¥hlberg, and Lajos Steiner.  


In December 1933, Sir Umar took Sultan Khan back to India. In 1935, Sultan Khan won a match against V. K. Khadilkar, yielding just one draw in ten games. However, after this match, Sultan Khan retreated to his farm in Sargodha and the chess world never heard from him again.


Ghulam Fatima, a chess player who alsoworked for Sir Umar in his household in London and who won the British Ladies Championship in 1933 by a remarkable three point margin, scoring ten wins, one draw, and no losses, told Hooper and Whyld for their book about Sultan Khan that Khan, on leaving England, “felt that he had been freed from prison.”  Apparently, in the damp English climate, Sultan Khan had been continually afflicted with malaria, colds, influenza, and throat infections, often arriving to play with his neck swathed in bandages.  Sir Umar died in 1944. 


Mir Sultan Khan lived for the rest of his life with his family in Sargodha. Ather Sultan, his eldest son, recalled that he would not coach his children at chess, telling them that they should do something more useful with their lives.


Sultan Khan died of tuberculosis in Sargodha, Pakistan (the same district where he had been born) on April 25, 1966. 


In his brief but meteoric career, Sultan Khan rose to the top of the chess world, playing on even terms with the world's best players. By Arpad Elo's calculation, his playing strength during his five-year peak was equivalent to an Elo rating of 2530, the rating score for an International Grandmaster designation.  However, in 1950, when FIDE first awarded the titles of International Grandmaster and International Master, Sultan Khan had not played for 15 years. Although FIDE awarded titles to some long-retired players who had distinguished careers earlier in their lives, such as Rubinstein and Carlos Torre, FIDE never awarded any title to Sultan Khan.


Hooper and Whyld, Sultan Khan's biographers, wrote of him:

When Sultan Khan first travelled to Europe his English was so rudimentary that he needed an interpreter. Unable to read or write, he never studied any books on the game, and he was put into the hands of trainers who were also his rivals in play. He never mastered openings which, by nature empirical, cannot be learned by the application of common sense alone. Under these adverse circumstances, and having known international chess for a mere seven years, only half of which was spent in Europe, Sultan Khan nevertheless had few peers in the middlegame, was among the world's best two or three endgame players, and one of the world's best ten players. This achievement brought admiration from Capablanca who called him a genius, an accolade he rarely bestowed.

88888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888

Overlooked No More: Sultan Khan, Untrained Chess Player Who Became a Champion

He beat some of the world’s top players despite growing up with little access to chess books and not having the same knowledge his rivals possessed.

A black-and-white photo of a man sitting down and wearing a blazer while looking down at a chess board with his head resting in his hand.
Sultan Khan in 1933. In a whirlwind period of four years, he competed against the world’s best chess players and more than held his own.Credit...ANL/Shutterstock
A black-and-white photo of a man sitting down and wearing a blazer while looking down at a chess board with his head resting in his hand.

This article is part of Overlooked, a series of obituaries about remarkable people whose deaths, beginning in 1851, went unreported in The Times.

In July 1929, 12 chess players gathered at Chatham House School, a venerable institution in Ramsgate, England, to contest the British championship. The field included several well-known masters, as well as one player who stood out from the rest because he was not from England, but from the jewel of the British Empire: India.

His name was Sultan Khan.

It is doubtful that the other competitors knew much about him, and they probably did not regard him as much of a threat. At the time, Europe was the center of the chess world, and though Khan had won the All-India Championship the year before, it was most likely against an inferior level of competition compared with what he would face in the upcoming tournament.

In addition, there were differences in the rules of chess played on the subcontinent. For example, pawns could not move two squares on their first turn, and there was no similar rule for castling. Instead, on one move during the game, the king could move like a knight. The need to adjust to how the game was played in Europe gave Khan ‌a significant handicap‌, particularly in the early phase of games‌.

Story continues below advertisement

Continue reading the main story

Growing up in India under British rule, Khan also had little or no access to chess books, so he knew next to nothing about the theory of how to begin games — knowledge that his rivals possessed.

None of that stopped him. Khan won the championship convincingly, recording victories in more than half his games while losing only once. This marked the beginning of a whirlwind period of four years in which Khan competed against the world’s best players and more than held his own.

Despite his first name, Khan was not royalty. According to a 2020 article by Ather Sultan, his oldest son, and Atiyab Sultan, one of his granddaughters, written for the Pakistani news site Dawn, Khan was born in 1903 (some other sources say 1905) in Khushab, a town in the Punjab region of modern-day Pakistan. His family were landowners and pirs, or Sufi religious guides.

Image
A black-and-white photograph of many tables with chess boards and men deep in concentration while looking down at their own boards. Sultan Khan is standing and making his move on one of the boards before a group of onlookers standing on the opposite side of the table.
In 1931, Khan played 24 games simultaneously at the Empire Social Chess Club in England.Credit...Bettmann, via Getty Images
A black-and-white photograph of many tables with chess boards and men deep in concentration while looking down at their own boards. Sultan Khan is standing and making his move on one of the boards before a group of onlookers standing on the opposite side of the table.

Khan learned to play chess from his father, Mian Nizam Din, when he was young, and he was the best player in Punjab by the time he was 21. A wealthy landowner, Sir Umar Hayat Khan Tiwana, hired him to develop a chess team, for which he received a monthly stipend and room and board. When Sir Umar went to live in London in 1929 so he could attend the Round Table Conferences for parliamentary reform in India, Khan went with him.

Story continues below advertisement

Continue reading the main story

Sitting at a chess table, Khan cut a striking figure with his lean face, wide forehead and sharp eyes. He often wore a white turban. He was unperturbable, almost disconcertingly so. Regardless of the position on the board, his demeanor remained placid. He did not think that he had any special skill at chess but felt that “the player applying the greater concentration should win,” David Hooper and Kenneth Whyld wrote in their book “The Oxford Companion to Chess” (1984).

After his triumph at the British championship, Khan briefly returned to India, but he was back in England by May 1930 and began receiving invitations to compete in elite tournaments. He soon proved to be among the best players in the world.

He tied for fourth in a tournament in Scarborough, England, in June and July 1930 that included, in addition to the top English players, five of the strongest players from the European continent.

He then represented England as its top player in the third Chess Olympiad in Hamburg, Germany, a gathering of the top teams from the top chess countries in the world. Khan scored nine wins against four losses and four draws.

Story continues below advertisement

Continue reading the main story

After Hamburg, Khan competed in Liège, Belgium, in an invitation-only tournament with some of Europe’s top players. This time, he took second, behind Savielly Tartakower of Poland. A few months later, Khan beat Tartakower in a 12-game match.

At an annual elite tournament in Hastings in late 1930 and early 1931, Khan finished third behind Max Euwe, who would become world champion in 1935, and José Raúl Capablanca, a former world champion who was still considered by many to be the world’s best player. During the competition, Khan caused a sensation by beating Capablanca, slowly outplaying him in a style reminiscent of Capablanca himself.

At the 1931 Chess Olympiad in Prague, Khan again led the English team and again had an outstanding result, with eight wins, seven draws and two losses. His victories included wins against Akiba Rubinstein and Salomon Flohr, two of the top 10 players in the world, and among his draws were games against Alexander Alekhine, the reigning world champion, and Efim Bogolyubov, who had twice played Alekhine for the title.

Khan failed to defend the British title in 1931, finishing in a tie for second, and ended the year by placing fourth at the 1931-32 Hastings tournament.

In 1932, he tied for third in a tournament in London that included Alekhine, Flohr and Tartakower. After narrowly losing a match to Flohr, Khan played in the Cambridge Premier League and beat most of Britain’s best players, including Conel Hugh O’Donel Alexander, the Irish cryptologist who would go on to work with Alan Turing during World War II to crack the German Enigma machine.

Story continues below advertisement

Continue reading the main story
Image
Two men seated at a chess table and smiling before a crowd of onlookers who are standing.
Khan playing against Theodore Henry Tylor at the British Chess Championship in London in 1932.Credit...Smith Archive/Alamy Stock Photo
Two men seated at a chess table and smiling before a crowd of onlookers who are standing.

Khan wrapped up the year by placing fourth in a tournament in Bern, Switzerland, that included Alekhine, Euwe, Flohr and Bogoljubov; winning the British Championship for the second time; and tying for third at the 1932-33 Hastings tournament.

Khan’s last competitive year, 1933, was much slower. The only major events he participated in were the Olympiad in Folkestone, England, again as England’s top player, and the British championship, at which he won the title for the third time.

In December 1933, Sir Umar decided to return to India, and Khan returned with him, as it was too expensive to stay. Khan was evidently happy to leave England. He disliked the cold, rainy weather and had suffered bouts of malaria and continual colds and sore throats. Ghulam Fatima, a chess player who worked for Sir Umar in his household in London and who won the British women’s championship in 1933, told Hooper and Whyld for their book that Khan, on leaving England, “felt that he had been freed from prison.”

Back in India, Khan played one match in 1935, against V.K. Khadilkar, beating him soundly by winning nine games and drawing one.

Story continues below advertisement

Continue reading the main story

And that was it. He stopped playing, at least in competitions.

In a short documentary that aired on British television in the late 1970s, Ather Sultan said that he had once asked his father why he had not tried to play for the world championship, and that his father said that, at the time, the challenger needed to put up a stake of 2,000 pounds (about $230,000 in today’s dollars), which he did not have.

According to the Dawn article, Khan then married and had five sons and six daughters. He spent the rest of his life cultivating his farmland before dying in Sargodha on April 25, 1966.

While his children and grandchildren learned to play chess, they mostly followed other careers. Ather Sultan said that his father had “told them they should do something more useful with their lives.”

There were no official rankings when Khan played, but according to Chess Metrics, a widely respected website that has compiled retroactive rankings going back more than 200 years, he was No. 6 or No. 7 in the world over the last two years of his chess-playing career. Hooper and Whyld surmised that Khan overcame his lack of knowledge about openings because he was among the best players in the world in the middle-game phase and ‌among the top two or three players in the endgame phase, along with Capablanca.

“Black & White: The Official Biography of Chess Champion Sultan Khan,” by Atiyab Sultan and Ather Sultan, will be published in June.

Story continues below advertisement

Continue reading the main story

In the Dawn article, his son and granddaughter noted ruefully that many of the players Khan defeated were anointed grandmasters and international masters by the International Chess Federation when the federation began giving out those titles in 1950, even though most of them had passed their primes. But Khan was never similarly recognized.

Perhaps the best sobriquet he could have received, however, came from a revered contemporary. Capablanca, who is often considered one of the greatest natural talents of all time, described Khan in his writings with a word that he almost never used: “genius.”

No comments:

Post a Comment